The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2004, 05:01 PM
mike_nh mike_nh is offline
Senior Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 232
Default should stevie and f. mac retire?

I know this will be unpopular with the ''hardcore'' fans but
to be realistic stevie had a very good point in the documantary
by saying that they need to sell to people betwen the ages
of 10-27. and if you know anything about stevie you know that
it's all about the lyrics. thats why we listen..the music is great
but right now in theese times people won't get it. and stevie
is right. times have changed and so have the fans. Even if
they write the best songs of their lives no one will really
hear it because it's all about ''the look'' you got people like
britney,eminem,and all those others that are just out to make
a quick buck and get noticed for doing something shocking.
In my opinion the true artists of our generation like stevie,
fleetwood mac,bob seger,the eagles,ect really don't fit in
today's world of music. so instead of trying to compeate with
the ''artists'' of today they should take pride in what they have
done. stevie and fleetwooc mac don't need to compeate with
anyone. stevie is a legend and she left her mark as one of
the all time greats and no one will ever be able to take that away
from her. stevie and fleetwood mac have nothing left to prove
so thats why i think they should retire.
And as for stevie..she's got one hurdle left....see ya in 2006
when she gets inducted into the rock n roll hall of fame as a
solo artist.
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 03-21-2004, 05:03 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quite the opposite, actually.

They have nothing to prove so they should release music that isn't necessarily commercial. Like Lindsey's SYW material, for example. They should explore new musical avenues and try to develop some different stuff that interests them that they weren't able to do when they were so popular for fear of alienation.

__________________


Last edited by dissention; 03-21-2004 at 05:09 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-21-2004, 05:42 PM
GardenStateGirlie's Avatar
GardenStateGirlie GardenStateGirlie is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: living in a dreamworld.
Posts: 6,822
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dissention
Quite the opposite, actually.

They have nothing to prove so they should release music that isn't necessarily commercial. Like Lindsey's SYW material, for example. They should explore new musical avenues and try to develop some different stuff that interests them that they weren't able to do when they were so popular for fear of alienation.

Argreed. Their fanbase is well-established and they've managed to pick up a younger following due in part to the fact that many people of my generation grew up with Fleetwood Mac in their household or discovered them on their own as children. They're able to explore new musical avenues because as dissention said, they've already prooved themselves by being a band with staying power. If they can still get people to go and see them and if people are still buying their music, why can't they continue to make it and tour? The demand for them is still out there (they proved that in 97' with an amazing reunion tour and in the past year with the SYW tour which has done very well, btw). No, they don't have to retire. They just have to keep making the kind of music that they want to make I have no doubts that whatever they come up with next will be equally as good if not better than some of their classics
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2004, 05:55 PM
Johnny Stew's Avatar
Johnny Stew Johnny Stew is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 12,145
Default

I think the 'Say You Will' recording process was all about seeing if they could work together again.

Yes, they could tour and get along... but could they actually go thru the process of recording an album, and promoting it, without ending up at each other's throats?
It's a different set of pressures and anxieties.

So my thought is that now that they've gotten past that hurdle, and they've proven to themselves they can still do it and get along (let's face it, none of the bickering was all that major), then the next time out, they should have an easier time and feel more confident.

I think the band is as aware as anyone, that they'll most likely never again sell 4 million copies of a new studio album, but that's no reason why they should break up, as long as they still feel that the chemistry is there, and as long as they still enjoy being in each other's company.
Because they're just as artistically viable, if not more so, than most of their "classic rock" peers.
__________________
"Although the arrogance of fame lingers like a thick cloud around the famous, the sun always seems to shine for Stevie." -- Richard Dashut, 2014
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2004, 06:04 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,444
Default

I think as long as it's fun for them & they're healthy, they should keep on going, keep touring, recording, writing. We fans will always be there for them.

Lee
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-21-2004, 07:08 PM
diamondsnake's Avatar
diamondsnake diamondsnake is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,023
Default

No way. My only concern is that they might not want to make another album since SYW did not sell 1,000,000+. But hopefully they don't really care about that.

And since they were one of the biggest money making tours of 2003, obviously they have a fanbase to rival Britney and Christina's.

And, I do believe that they have a young fanbase. Maybe not a ton of teenagers, but at the show I went to, I saw a lot of 20-somethings. And I think this is largely because of The Dance. Without The Dance there would not be too many young fans today, like me. I am only 15 and I am a huge FM fan. Of course, a lot of people think this is weird. When I went to the FM show in Atlanta, everyone who we chatted with thought I was taging along with my Dad to the show, when it was really the other way around.
__________________
Christopher


We were frail...
Save us...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-21-2004, 07:40 PM
EveryHour's Avatar
EveryHour EveryHour is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle USA
Posts: 1,237
Default Re: should stevie and f. mac retire?

Quote:
Originally posted by mike_nh
Even if
they write the best songs of their lives no one will really
hear it because it's all about ''the look'' you got people like
britney,eminem,and all those others that are just out to make
a quick buck and get noticed for doing something shocking.

FM should just keep doing what they're doing because the problem here is with the music industry and society....not them! Plus, not all newer artists are only about image, and there have always been artists that are (all the way back to the manufactured teen idol artists of the 50's). It's nothing new.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-21-2004, 08:12 PM
CarneVaca CarneVaca is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,228
Default

It wouldn't bother me if Stevie retired...
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2004, 08:27 PM
Lux
This message has been deleted by Lux.
  #9  
Old 03-21-2004, 10:37 PM
GardenStateGirlie's Avatar
GardenStateGirlie GardenStateGirlie is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: living in a dreamworld.
Posts: 6,822
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CarneVaca
It wouldn't bother me if Stevie retired...
Hey! Watch it, mister! Be glad I like you
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-21-2004, 11:54 PM
Miranda Miranda is offline
Senior Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ramona, California
Posts: 204
Default

They should do one album of all new material worked on in the studio together from start to finish. Has that happened since Rumours?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-22-2004, 12:09 AM
DownOnRodeo's Avatar
DownOnRodeo DownOnRodeo is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 3,786
Default

I believe that the next album, if and when it eventuates, will make a big sizeable commercial imprint. As long as they don't let the momentum fall away too much. The last thing we need is another 'reunion album' - we want 'the next album' from Fleetwood Mac. (And the next, and the next. )

I think that SYW was a bit too irregular to be as big commercially as it could have been. Was it a one-off reunion album or a new release in the new lease on their career started with The Dance? Was it a 1990s Lindsey solo album or a sequel to TISL?

I think that the next studio release, if it eventuates, will (or at least should) be a much more uniform effort. I want the same sound in all the tracks. If that means re-recording Down On Rodeo, Hit n Run etc, then they should. If the band as a whole is going to have a bigger impact on the market, it needs to 'stand united', or fall divided, commercially (not that SYW 'fell' - but it didn't quite soar). That's what makes FM, Rumours, and TITN stand out, IMO - the instruments and vocals had a unique, homogenous sound. Mirage did too but as the band has admitted there wasn't as much good writing in its songs as on the other three big hits.

I'd like to imagine that the 'sound' of the next CD will be like 'Love Minus Zero' and 'NMB'. A whole album like that... ahhh.
__________________
Joe
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-24-2004, 01:09 AM
coldplay's Avatar
coldplay coldplay is offline
Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Downunder
Posts: 79
Default Re: should stevie and f. mac retire?

Originally posted by mike_nh

Even if they write the best songs of their lives no one will really hear it because it's all about ''the look'' you got people like
britney,eminem,and all those others that are just out to make
a quick buck and get noticed for doing something shocking.


Couple of things here.

First, we will hear it.

Second, there are plenty of successful acts targetting younger audiences that resist buying into the image deal. Which is not to say they don't have an image at all but paradoxically their image is 'less image'....less overt. Norah Jones and John Mayer are some examples of jeans and t-shirt styles.

Interestingly, Jones and Mayer are also good examples of younger acts that can play instruments and write their own songs.

Third, one way of reaching new audiences is through soundtracks. God forbid that FMac should end up on a Disney film but it certainly is a way of reaching new audiences that wouldn't otherwise buy a Mac album. I'm sure this is one of the reasons that Sting, Paul Simon, Annie Lennox etc do soundtrack work.


In my opinion the true artists of our generation like stevie,
fleetwood mac,bob seger,the eagles,ect really don't fit in
today's world of music.


They don't fit in. What does that mean exactly? I don't think there is any point trying to fit squares into circles. The music industry is complex and diverse. Yes, today's music is dominated by hiney shakin' babes but why can't veteran acts stand alongside those acts?

Stevie and fleetwood mac have nothing left to prove
so thats why i think they should retire.


Getting an artist to stop creating art is not an easy thing to do.

Same with sports - 47 yr old tennis champion Martina Navratilova is one of the most successful players in history. She has nothing to prove to anyone but the reason why she's playing (and winning Grand Slam titles) is because she loves the game.

Cheers
CP
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-24-2004, 02:02 AM
Janis_no1's Avatar
Janis_no1 Janis_no1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,156
Talking hmmmm

This will be a rather interesting list i assume..

My simple thoughts are:

RETIRE = NO

OUT OF TOUCH = NO

STILL ABLE TO WRITE THEIR OWN MATERIAL = YES!

Quote:
DOWNONRODEO
I think that SYW was a bit too irregular to be as big commercially as it could have been. Was it a one-off reunion album or a new release in the new lease on their career started with The Dance? Was it a 1990s Lindsey solo album or a sequel to TISL?
I agree Joe (i hope i got it right this time.. ) though i never thought about it..

I believe that a scattered album creates scattered opinions. This album was not a joint collaboration, which was a shame, but to be honest my guess is that Stevie wont again hang out in the studio for the whole length of time it takes to write, rpoduce and record an album... Time will tell wont it, and whatever they may release in the future i know i and most likely all of you will still buy it.. but its whether it can catch more attention that will be the deciding factor as to whether their future is certain...

All i do know is that Lindsey certainly wants to keep going, we know Mick will be there, John just goes along with whatever and Stevie, well I dont think Stevie is even sure as to what she will feel in the future so therefore i shall have to make the decision for her and say YES! lol

__________________
Jayne~~

Last edited by Janis_no1; 03-24-2004 at 02:07 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-24-2004, 02:28 AM
Johnny Stew's Avatar
Johnny Stew Johnny Stew is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 12,145
Default

Joe, I agree with everything you said... so, Amen, bro!
__________________
"Although the arrogance of fame lingers like a thick cloud around the famous, the sun always seems to shine for Stevie." -- Richard Dashut, 2014
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-24-2004, 02:53 AM
DownOnRodeo's Avatar
DownOnRodeo DownOnRodeo is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 3,786
Default

Thanks JS and Jayne - I assumed I'd made another crackpot late-night ramble that no one could make any sense of but I guess I was wrong.
__________________
Joe
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stevie Nicks web Layout site gypsydreamer1 Stevie Nicks 2 04-13-2004 01:38 PM


Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue picture

Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue

$15.38



Billy Burnette-Today Is Elvis' Birthday (Grand Avenue GAR-7001-2,2 Song CD) picture

Billy Burnette-Today Is Elvis' Birthday (Grand Avenue GAR-7001-2,2 Song CD)

$24.99



BILLY BURNETTE S/T Self-Titled  1980 Columbia In Shrink w/Hype Sticker Rock  NM picture

BILLY BURNETTE S/T Self-Titled 1980 Columbia In Shrink w/Hype Sticker Rock NM

$11.99



Billy Burnette by Billy Burnette (LP, Vinyl Record, 1980 CBS Records) Rockabilly picture

Billy Burnette by Billy Burnette (LP, Vinyl Record, 1980 CBS Records) Rockabilly

$5.98



Billy Burnette - Gimme You [New CD] picture

Billy Burnette - Gimme You [New CD]

$15.38




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved