Atheist Tries to Behead Christian Neighbors

[estranged4life]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

on festive occasions, I can be amusing

us ol' Ledgies like ya.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by ajmccarrell

You'd much rather take unfounded cheap shots, but then again, I don't expect more out of you.

We'd debate you, you just don't have any skills. When pressed, you simply change the subject to something else. That is not a debate. I'm kind of amazed at your inablility to stay on point. We've had some pretty legendary debates on here. Go read the archives.

[mylittledemon]

Hey, cant we all keep this forum from returning to the way it was before that "other" fleetwood mac forum was formed earlier this year?

[ajmccarrell]

Originally Posted by estranged4life

to defend my position to you, simple as that...and I dont align myself down party lines as you stated earlier (Though it appears you do - kind of hypocritical dontcha think?)

Seems like when the Liberals members here show their facts, you answer by rambling and rambling not really making a case point that is totally comprehensible nor do you back up you words.

Over the years as a member here, I watched many such as yourself get burnt over and over again with the same style of debating the Democrats here...

And it seems your getting toasted in the same manner - Open mouth, insert foot and enjoy sandwich!

And unlike SOME, I dont post egotistical stuff such as "The difference is that your ego has no accomplishments to back it up."

Brian "Here before you arrived, will still be here when you're gone" j.

Again, you just attacked me and dodged my question. I did back up my position. I sent you to some readings, but you chose to ignore them.

http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4076

Here is a nice summary of arguments made, so you won't have to read the entire books on the subject by Christopher Hitchens and the like.

[ajmccarrell]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

We'd debate you, you just don't have any skills. When pressed, you simply change the subject to something else. That is not a debate. I'm kind of amazed at your inablility to stay on point. We've had some pretty legendary debates on here. Go read the archives.

Why waste my time reading that tripe. I haven't changed the subject, no less than five times today I've asked the person responding to me to challenge my argument and not me personally. Try taking my positions down. No one has tried yet, they just accuse me of something. Come on, try it. LOL!

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

Hey, cant we all keep this forum from returning to the way it was before that "other" fleetwood mac forum was formed earlier this year?

Has nothing to do with that.

[estranged4life]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

We'd debate you, you just don't have any skills. When pressed, you simply change the subject to something else. That is not a debate. I'm kind of amazed at your inablility to stay on point. We've had some pretty legendary debates on here. Go read the archives.

irishgrl - Watching you gldstwmn and irishgrl debate others was worth the paying membership.

[BombaySapphire3]

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

Hey, cant we all keep this forum from returning to the way it was before that "other" fleetwood mac forum was formed earlier this year?

you mean when we had great and interesting people like Amber ,dissention .Mari ,rickypt and others ?That would be a most welcome return IMHO.

[mylittledemon]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Has nothing to do with that.

If you say so. I do trust you, after all...

[mylittledemon]

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

you mean when we had great and interesting people like Amber ,dissention .Mari ,rickypt and others ?That would be a most welcome return IMHO.

I've actually forgotten the names of the one or two I managed to routinely piss off. No joke.

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by ajmccarrell

Why waste my time reading that tripe . . .

res ipsa loquitur - Id.

[ajmccarrell]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

res ipsa loquitur - Id.

Or superego.

[estranged4life]

Terrorism would exist even if religion never existed.

^^^My statement

Sure it would. You don't think some other excuse would be used to kill people?

^^^Your statement

My retort: Huh? Did you misunderstand? Apparently so.

There can be terrorism without ANY religion EVER existing on this planet. Read some history books friend, white people (US Cavalry soldiers) terrorized the Indians for the wealth of land that was theirs, it was called the "Trail of Tears". How about how white people TERRORIZING those of a Middle-Easteren ethnic background for a TERROR act that they had ZERO part in (OKC Bombing). How about white people terrorizing blacks because of their skin color - So YES, three EASILY IDENTIFIABLE proofs that TERRORISM can be accomplished without RELIGION.

Terror exists without religion - and it will continue on and on and on...

[Mad4stevie]

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

you mean when we had great and interesting* people like Amber ,dissention .Mari ,rickypt and others ?That would be a most welcome return IMHO.

I know I haven't been around much . . . but did something happen???? Come to think of it, I haven't seen them on here and they were always on here . . .

[Sorceress]

If we ignore him, he might go away! Arguing with him only makes him feel more important.