#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lindsey Songs: Tusk vs. Mirage
I just finished reading the thread about which Lindsey "Tusk" songs might have freaked out the record executives, so I had to start this thread. I think Lindsey's songs on "Mirage" are far more odd than anything on "Tusk". I thought this the day I bought "Mirage" in 1982. I remember thinking that I had never heard stranger music in my life, from any band or artist, and I still think that now. Then there's that whole thing in interviews where Mick and others have said that with "Mirage", the band wanted to do something "more accessible" than the "Tusk" album. But to me, Lindsey's songs on "Mirage" were not. To this day, I have never heard anything more strange than "Can't Go Back" or "Empire State". There's nothing on "Tusk" that even approaches this weirdness for me. Even "Eyes Of The World", which is slightly more "accessible", the production is very strange (compared to the more straight-forward live versions of this song).
I don't see much discussion about Lindsey's "Mirage" songs, and I'm wondering if anyone else feels this way? |
. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Totally do (agree that is). I remember hearing "Mirage" for the first time, after listening to "Tusk" for 5 or so straight playthroughs.
After hearing an album which was held together so cohesively by Lindsey, Mirage's biggest flaw, I still feel, is the lack of good Lindsey songs. It's almost like the tracks should have been held over for "Go Insane", they remind me a lot of his quirky solo album just before Mirage, "Law and Order" (which IMO is not very good). Mirage is like LaO II with good McVie and Nicks songs :P I like Eyes of the World, especially live. But Christine and Stevie save the day. Yeah, Can't Go Back, Book of Love, Empire State are all weird songs. I like all of them though. They are very representative of Lindsey in that period I think. Empire State is just kind of out of place and very Lindsey-solo-work, although I like it. The other two fit on the album, but the production is very odd given Tusk's well done acoustic-y feel, I agree (although I know, it's supposed to sound dreamlike :P ). Last comment- I think Tusk has weirder songs. The Ledge being a good example. But yeah, all his work on Mirage is weird, and I think it's the only album outside of LaO that I would say that about. Enough for now! - Spike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
My favorite song on that album is "Book of Love," but it sounds pretty normal to me -- for Fleetwood Mac.
My second favorite is "Can't Go Back," which doesn't sound so much weird as tinky-slinky winky-dinky. "Can't Go Back," from the point of view of songcraft, is actually a terrifically well-planned & rendered song.
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Also, lyrically the "can't go back" reminds me of John Stewart's Liddy Buck and the lovely words about Lindsey trying to tear down the sky for a star. Awesome. Michele |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Personally I despise "Can't Go Back"- it's just a bit too sappy and sugary for my taste, much in the same way that I despise "You and I Pt. II." Upon first hearing it all those years ago, my initial reaction was that Lindsey was trying too hard to be commercial, and that it was meant to be a tongue-in-cheek joke in a way. And the fact that they tossed it out there as a b-side to the "Hold Me" single says it all; I've always considered album-cuts-that-become-b-sides to be the biggest insult of all. It's basically the band or record label saying that the song sucks so badly that it would never stand a chance of becoming an A-side or even a radio hit. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It's not terrifically complex -- or even complex at all -- but it shows very well how Lindsey thinks in terms of gluing motives together to create an arrangement around his lyrics & chords. Stevie doesn't think that way. Lindsey used to say that Stevie made her words & vocal melody central to her songs. It's not that she makes them central; it's that she makes them totally exclusive. That's all there is in a Stevie Nicks song (before an arranger gets to it). She doesn't construct the track part by part. She doesn't paint that canvas. Consequently, if she doesn't put a terrific vocal on a track of hers, or write some terrific lyrics, there's nothing left. If Lindsey doesn't do a good vocal or lyric, chances are still good there'll be something else to listen to in the track because he has built other things in. If Stevie had sung "Gypsy" crappily or written crappy words, we could still enjoy the 5-tone scale motive Lindsey built into it. It's craftsmanlike. It displays musical thinking rather than (or in addition to) verbal thinking. It's what pop music is for, as far as I'm concerned. It's what the Beatles & George Martin excelled at.
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lyrically perhaps, but musically it's more akin to "Not That Funny". In fact, "Liddy Buck" fits right in when you insert it into the Tusk playlist. Either way, it's a great song.
__________________
. . ... . . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Mirage is so pleasing to my taste.. David, is "Eyes of the World" intro a take on Pachebel's Canon.. I've always pondered this.. have we talked about it before? My memory fails me...
__________________
I would tell Christine Perfect, "You're Christine f***ing McVie, and don't you forget it!" Last edited by jbrownsjr; 12-02-2009 at 03:17 PM.. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As a viewer, I have an unavoidable problem with the Delmer Daves film DARK PASSAGE: When I see a man whose entire head is covered in bandages (excluding peepholes & blowhole), I laugh hysterically.
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Michele |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I'll take that as a yes?
__________________
I would tell Christine Perfect, "You're Christine f***ing McVie, and don't you forget it!" |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yeah, I don't think "real Stevie" shows up much on Mirage or Tango. I don't like Can't Go Back as much as Book of Love, which I really like. I think the problem with both of them is that Lindsey always needs more lyrics to fill his songs up. i've always felt that Lindsey's strength is music and Stevie's is lyrics, which is amplified on their solo albums. Christine has strengths in both, although solo she kind of misses both. I feel Mirage is musically solid but lyrically near-bankrupt, save for Gypsy, Straight Back, and a couple of other tracks. Think "Eyes of the World"- could've been an amazing piece with more lyrics, instead of hardly any, and then repeated. Instead it kinda sounds half-finished lyrically and musically excellent. Tusk, although it's weird-sounding in parts, is lyrically near-flawless. Musically I think it's weirder, and to me, going to the topic title, it's THAT which scared record execs, the music of Tusk. Rumours and Mirage are much 'safer' musically than Tusk, which was experimental for its' time. Mirage is pop-goodness but it could've been so much better with minimal extra effort. It continues to bug me everytime I hear it. But I still love it.. I guess I'm a tragic Mac-er after all. - Spike Last edited by Spikey; 12-03-2009 at 06:21 PM.. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I do love "melodies awaken sorrows from their sleep" and think it is especially fitting, given the Mac's past. Michele Last edited by michelej1; 12-03-2009 at 11:12 PM.. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|
Stevie Nicks Concert Tour Shoulder Tote Bag 15x15
$69.95
Stevie Nicks Tour 2024 Sweatshirt, Stevie Nicks Tour Live In Concert T-Shirt
$31.99
Stevie Nicks/Janis Joplin Personally Owned Beads
$3800.00
Stevie Nicks Concert Shirt Stevie Nicks 2024 Tour Merch 2024 Stevie Nicks Live
$31.39
Stevie Nicks - Complete Studio Albums & Rarities [New CD] Boxed Set
$69.80