Lindsey Buckingham's complaint against FM - Filed 10/9/18 in Los Angeles - document

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by DeepBlueDee

No, it isn't. The judge won't be changing legislation to decide what does and does not constitute an oral contract, which is exactly the same as an oral agreement, which YOU claimed they had. You keep changing your statements to suit your agenda.

What the judge will decide is if LB can prove he had an oral contract with FM and whether or not there was just cause to terminate him. I have no idea what evidence either side intends to present at trial, and neither do you. Either way, it's a sad, sorry way for this band to go out, at this late stage in the game, both for the fans, and the legacy of the band.

Judges interpret "legislation" i.e. law at every level of our court system up to and including the Supreme Court. Once a case is adjudicated by the Supremes then and only then is it considered settled law. That is why it is extremely important that we are careful about the appointees to the court.
Just because legislation is passed does not mean it is constitutional.