#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And surely Lindsey's heavy eye makeup during the late '70s could have been grounds to ask about his sexual preferences? But in all seriousness, does anyone else think some of the quotes from the band members seem a bit suspect? For instance, the amount of cursing in Stevie's quotes... that's just not her style.
__________________
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In general, Christine is immune to such stories but that is because her image is so anti-rock anyway. Her drinking is mentioned, but never in a salacious way. Even now, when she admits to cocaine usage (more clearly and directly than ever before) it is all very subdued. |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Do the Stevie coke-up-bum rumours kind of make that method of drug use sound a teensy weensy bit enticing to anyone else...? Like... are you guys curious...?
No? Yeah, me neither. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
All I know is that Christine and Lindsey are working on music together again in some capacity.
I don't care if Stevie, Lindsey and Christine run around naked in West Hollywood. Just get us an album and a tour.
__________________
I would tell Christine Perfect, "You're Christine f***ing McVie, and don't you forget it!" |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But if the three of them DID run around naked in West Hollywood, that'd generate a lot of buzz about the new record. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Considering what you said below, I'm surprised you think the only questionable thing in the article was the sexual orientation bit. As long as the tone makes a good impression of Stevie and Chris and the only person coming off poorly is the only one who's motives you suspect, then it's okay to believe this article as the rare good one in a publication known for being nothing but complete trash? Quote:
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Vitriol was me overstating. That's a bad habit of mine. Sorry.
Quote:
I wouldn't mind The Daily Mail as a pop-culture rag. It's the framing of itself as a "serious" news publication that I find so objectionable. It can do celebrity gossip and interviews 'til the cows come home. Its seemingly random query into Stevie's potential sexual experimentations with women just reeked of frat-boy smarminess to me, and stood out from the rest of the article in that way. Could you be more specific about what parts of the article you disliked? Genuinely interested, here. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
The Daily Mail!! - now causing disagreements on here. |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
I honestly thought most of the article was stuff we've heard before from other sources? That may not make any of it true, but it's certainly corroborated. I can't fault the Mail on that one, much as I'd like to.
As for the actual quotes, it certainly wouldn't be surprising if they were "embellished". I don't read enough interviews to really pick up on what Louie and MrStevie are finding iffy about the quotes, but it's a definite possibility. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
I agree that it seems doubtful this reviewer flew to 3 different countries to interview people in 1 band. It just doesn't make any sense. Many of these interviews are conducted over the phone. Yet, the interviewer describes the surroundings & facial expressions of his interviewees.
__________________
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
I just had a quick look through and they say Chris was interviewed 6 weeks after her appearance in London. I was presuming Stevie was interviewed by them around the same time, but they don't actually state that. She could have been interviewed much earlier than that
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What I will say about this interview is that Stevie gave a clearer description of New Zealand than she ever did before. She was never definite that Lindsey had kicked her before. She knew he did something to her though. She never saw him with his jacket over his head before (Mick said that), because she wasn't looking at him when he did that. And she never put the incident with him doing something to her in the same sequence of events as him throwing the guitar at her. So, when I read her quotes, I didn't think they didn't sound like her, but I did think she was giving a more concise, coherent and specific description of the events than she ever had before. It's like an amalgamation of other things that she has said before, but never said at once. Lindsey's "interview" sounds like all sentences he has said before. But we know Lindsey and he might very well say the same things over again. That would not be surprising. But take that comment about never buying cocaine. That's a quote from an interview he may have done 15 years ago. Christine's comments all sound new. But the thing with them taking the cocaine in ladylike spoonfuls and the boys coming at the end of the night to find their coke after the boys had used all of theirs up sounds more like something Stevie would say than Christine would. Stevie sounds like Stevie (but more adept at summarizing things than Stevie ever has been). Lindsey sounds like Lindsey. Christine mostly sounds like herself to me, but not the part about the men doing drugs vulgarly. Michele |
|
|
Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue
$15.38
Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette - CD
$18.99
Billy Burnette - Coming Home (CD, Album) (Very Good Plus (VG+)) - 2935365877
$4.25
Signed Tangled Up In Texas by Billy Burnette (CD, Capricorn/Warner Bros.,1992)
$35.00
Billy Burnette - Gimme You [New CD]
$15.38