Quote:
Originally posted by CarneVaca
Howart Kurtz, who doesn't do much for me usually (can you spell conflict of interest?) shows some real insght here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Dec17.html
In essence, he says some of the Democratic nomination candidates are now pouncing on Dean even though, with the exception of Lieberman, they had been attacking Bush for Iraq. This is particularly the case with Kerry and Gephardt, neither of which will ever become president now matter how many times they change their weasly positions.
Truly, the best person for the job is Dennis Kucinich, but he ain't got a chance. So Dean it is for me.
|
Dean changed his position on the war. I posted the article for you in The Reagans thread. I like Kucinich as well, who changed his stance on a woman's right to choose about a year ago.
I agreed with a lot of points in the article. I think the Republicans have already figured out what they're going to use against Dean. IMO, he's not the man for the job.