View Single Post
  #235  
Old 07-15-2008, 08:37 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmccarrell View Post
Again, you are cherry picking here. Bringing up BearsStearns is throwing out a red herring. Maybe 20% on that guy won't hurt anything. However, Obama stated he would like to see the minimum rate at 20% and the next tier at 40%. Capital gains tax is applied to any investment period. It applies to the guy trying to fund his retirement b buying rental homes, it applies to any of us who invest in 401(k)'s, anyone who invests in small business, etc. If you are taking 40% of any investment profit if you make over $200,000.00 a year, most small businesses will end up going overseas too. Hell, I'd move to Australia or move my money to some overseas company who wants it instead of a greedy US government that wants to punish success. Obama's plan would not just apply to multi-millionaires, but anyone with a successful small business, IE the guy who owns the car lot, the independant supermarket, the plumbing outsit, the construction company owner, the subcontractor, the building developer, the landlord, etc. Basically, anyone with any money in anything organized in a corporation. Taxing investment at that level costs the small business jobs, and at best, costs you your raise. I am never for "taxing the rich" because I've never been hired by a poor person. Under Obama's plan, if your AGI is above $200,000.00 you are paying out 40% of your profit to the government, on top of the other taxes that you would already be paying. It would paralize small business entirely and we would see a global depression that makes our current slowdown look like the biggest boom in history within his first term. Frankly, if you want to vote for the guy, you deserve to be out of work. Remember, it is people that make over $200,000.00 per year that do all of the hiring.

Basically party affiliation has this choice: I give up my way of life and my economic security and vote democrat, or I endure a bunch of morality crap from the republicans that has no chance of becoming law and at least maintain what I have.
So, you did poorly under Clinton - the largest economy in decades

If you did, you were way behind the curve http://clinton5.nara.gov/WH/Accompli...tyears-03.html

Caveat - I readily admit Clinton did not do it by himelf -- no Pres. could. But, he did do alot.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world

Last edited by strandinthewind; 07-15-2008 at 08:42 AM..
Reply With Quote