View Single Post
Old 10-18-2019, 06:42 AM
Macfan4life's Avatar
Macfan4life Macfan4life is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Somewhere out in the back of your mind
Posts: 3,019

Originally Posted by BLY View Post
I think the reason that Mirage and Tango didn’t have the “depth of greatness” was largely due to the solo career focus that was in full force from 1981-1987.
I see your point and would agree a tiny bit. The bigger picture is that while the band was creative naturally for their first 2 albums together and very creative for #3. The blowback from Tusk changed the band to be chasing commercial success. It was pivotal for the band for Mirage to chart hit singles and be radio friendly (aka music box). Even more so for Tango. I believe even in Mick's first book Lindsey was under tremendous pressure for the album to get Mick out of bankruptcy. My only point is that something that is not talked about (much). While Tusk is applauded these days for the risk the band took, there is no doubt it changed them forever and seeking commercial success and so anti-Tusk the rest of their album existence.
That is what irks me about Tusk. Not the album itself but the post Tusk era i.e. over compensating future projects. While Tusk is underproduced Mirage and Tango are way overproduced.

Still I believe.....BACKSTABBING AND BETRAYAL will show us how

Last edited by Macfan4life; 10-18-2019 at 06:45 AM..
Reply With Quote