Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMacD
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DownOnRode
But anyway, you're just extrapolating on my point that Irving, who was presumably contractually obliged to represent the best interests of his client Lindsey, may not have been doing so in connection with the matter of this FM tour. In which case, there would be questions of legal liability and professional standards/ethics violations.
|
To which he could argue that Lindsey breached his contract by going out of his way to hurt something he was heavily invested in.
To which Azoff could counter that Buckingham breached the contract by talking down the show. We’re not industry lawyers, so none of us know. I just know I thought he was in trouble when I heard him say that. |
Wow. The degree to which you have blown up that comment is mind-boggling.
Now it's so horrific that a manager is no longer legally obliged to represent his client to the best of his ability, despite happily taking a percentage of that naughty client's money? He is allowed to secretly not provide a service which he is telling his client he is providing, and is accepting money to provide? He's allowed to commit fraud?
Wow. Just wow.
I don't have to be an industry lawyer to see the flaws in that logic.
Irving Azoff is not that foolish or petty. He went with the money. The money was with Stevie.