Quote:
Originally Posted by sodascouts
Wow. The degree to which you have blown up that comment is mind-boggling.
Now it's so horrific that a manager is no longer legally obliged to represent his client to the best of his ability, despite happily taking a percentage of that naughty client's money? He is allowed to secretly not provide a service which he is telling his client he is providing, and is accepting money to provide? He's allowed to commit fraud?
Wow. Just wow.
I don't have to be an industry lawyer to see the flaws in that logic.
Irving Azoff is not that foolish or petty. He went with the money. The money was with Stevie.
|
This comment. 100%. Especially the last line.