06-10-2018, 05:37 PM
|
|
Addicted Ledgie
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 423
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMacD
Hence why I said “If.”
It’s really just the difference between Crosby, Stills, & Nash vs. Crosby, Stills, Nash, & Young. No arenas, but still viable. And, because they wouldn’t be playing arenas, they would have significantly less overhead. So it could be a break even to slightly less profit for them.
|
Wow ... we agree. Fleetwood Mac without Stevie is a 2500ish seat band. Still viable but more of mid-level classic rock outfit rather than an arena band that can highlight a festival.
|