Quote:
Originally posted by dissention
So, for example, Bush has millions in a trust from his grandpa's dirty Nazi dealings. When he gets access to all that money, should he be able to keep it for himself or give it all back to the people who deserve it (the Jews)? The Bush family "dynasty" was majorly built on that money, while the people who suffered for it aren't nearly as rich. Shouldn't they get it in some form of compensation, maybe given to their local Jewish Community Center? The idea of reparations isn't far from that train of thought and it's a misconseption that these people just "want money." More often than not, it isn't the case.
|
Let him get judged for it.....I want no part in any reparation...If that is true, then that should be on Bush's back, and Bush's back alone...
Reparations are acceptable, as long as they come from where they need to come from.....But like I said....I have done nothing in order to havve to pay a reparation, so I never will, and alot of people feel this way.
~Alex
This thread got serious all of a sudden, lol
