The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Peter Green (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   "lady's man" (biography by m.c., chapter 13) (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=53758)

lazy poker 05-26-2014 12:53 PM

"lady's man" (biography by m.c., chapter 13)
 
ever since reading martin celmins' biography on peter, i was wondering who that mysterious "lady" in chapter 13 is (they've been together from 1971 up to 4th september 1975 - just 2 days before their planned wedding). what's her name, and why this remarkable secretiveness?

Ms Moose 06-09-2014 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazy poker (Post 1131240)
ever since reading martin celmins' biography on peter, i was wondering who that mysterious "lady" in chapter 13 is (they've been together from 1971 up to 4th september 1975 - just 2 days before their planned wedding). what's her name, and why this remarkable secretiveness?

I have been wondering too, but for some reason she wanted to be anonymous in the book. It has probably been a very traumatic experience being with this very unstable man for four years, and being treated so badly. And she may not wish to have that part of her life "open to the public". I don't blame her.

Her story is the only part of the book where we get a picture of what P.G. was like to live with just before his grasp on reality seriously snapped. It would be nice to have a more thorough and nuanced description of P.G.'s post-Fleetwood Mac life and personality, than the one in Celmins book. But I quess this is hard to achieve because of P.G.'s mental state, where his reflections on himself becomes very subjective and the people who had know him were chocked at the transformations in his personality.

Ms Moose

lazy poker 06-10-2014 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms Moose (Post 1131966)
I have been wondering too, but for some reason she wanted to be anonymous in the book. It has probably been a very traumatic experience being with this very unstable man for four years, and being treated so badly. And she may not wish to have that part of her life "open to the public". I don't blame her.

Her story is the only part of the book where we get a picture of what P.G. was like to live with just before his grasp on reality seriously snapped. It would be nice to have a more thorough and nuanced description of P.G.'s post-Fleetwood Mac life and personality, than the one in Celmins book. But I quess this is hard to achieve because of P.G.'s mental state, where his reflections on himself becomes very subjective and the people who had know him were chocked at the transformations in his personality.

Ms Moose

thank you for sharing your view on this subject, ms moose.
nevertheless it amazes me that the identity of the iraqi woman in question is obviously such a big secret, that nobody here could (or would?) share any enlightenment on who she is. i'm not givin' up yet . . .
martin

dino 06-15-2014 06:02 AM

She doesn't say she was treated badly as I recall though the relationship was understandably problematic. Some people have no desire to achieve notoriety or fame and have integrity, strange as it sounds in these times :).

sharksfan2000 06-15-2014 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazy poker (Post 1132059)
thank you for sharing your view on this subject, ms moose.
nevertheless it amazes me that the identity of the iraqi woman in question is obviously such a big secret, that nobody here could (or would?) share any enlightenment on who she is. i'm not givin' up yet . . .
martin

Don't know why it amazes you that someone chooses to retain their privacy. What would be the benefit in violating that choice to keep the matter private? Would you want a stranger poking into your private matters?

lazy poker 06-15-2014 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dino (Post 1132304)
She doesn't say she was treated badly as I recall though the relationship was understandably problematic. Some people have no desire to achieve notoriety or fame and have integrity, strange as it sounds in these times :).

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharksfan2000 (Post 1132315)
Don't know why it amazes you that someone chooses to retain their privacy. What would be the benefit in violating that choice to keep the matter private? Would you want a stranger poking into your private matters?

hi dino, sharksfan, and who else is reading this!

obviously there's some kind of misunderstanding here. it would never occur to me to blame anybody who wants to stay out of the limelight - no matter what the reason. and please don't accuse me of "poking into (...) private matters"! i was only asking if this woman's name is known by anyone here on the board (i still can't see anything being so terribly wrong with that!), and i'm astonished that though the part she played in peter's life is no secret, her name seems to be just that. there are so many things in peter's life that are known to and talked about by the public. and we could easily start a discussion if REALLY ALL of this knowledge should be any of our (the fans') business or not. let's face it: quite a chunk of it is definitely NOT!

i was never intending to offend ANYBODY! but if the board and the powers that be see any privacy potentially violated with this thread, i will respect this. on the other hand: in that case there'd be quite some more threads here that should be questioned - for my money, that is!

i can only hope matters are cleared out hereby. :sorry:

all the best to all of you
martin

sharksfan2000 06-16-2014 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazy poker (Post 1132329)
hi dino, sharksfan, and who else is reading this!

obviously there's some kind of misunderstanding here. it would never occur to me to blame anybody who wants to stay out of the limelight - no matter what the reason. and please don't accuse me of "poking into (...) private matters"! i was only asking if this woman's name is known by anyone here on the board (i still can't see anything being so terribly wrong with that!), and i'm astonished that though the part she played in peter's life is no secret, her name seems to be just that. there are so many things in peter's life that are known to and talked about by the public. and we could easily start a discussion if REALLY ALL of this knowledge should be any of our (the fans') business or not. let's face it: quite a chunk of it is definitely NOT!

i was never intending to offend ANYBODY! but if the board and the powers that be see any privacy potentially violated with this thread, i will respect this. on the other hand: in that case there'd be quite some more threads here that should be questioned - for my money, that is!

i can only hope matters are cleared out hereby. :sorry:

all the best to all of you
martin

No worries, Martin - you certainly didn't offend me and you're not violating anyone's privacy by bringing up this discussion. I just have a disagreement and maybe it's a misunderstanding as you say. But I figured that if this woman told Martin Celmins that she did not want to be identified in his book, then she wants to retain her privacy. It makes no difference to me whether I know her name or not, but I suppose others may feel differently.

dino 06-16-2014 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharksfan2000 (Post 1132366)
No worries, Martin - you certainly didn't offend me and you're not violating anyone's privacy by bringing up this discussion. I just have a disagreement and maybe it's a misunderstanding as you say. But I figured that if this woman told Martin Celmins that she did not want to be identified in his book, then she wants to retain her privacy. It makes no difference to me whether I know her name or not, but I suppose others may feel differently.

Same here.:nod:

lazy poker 06-16-2014 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharksfan2000 (Post 1132366)
No worries, Martin - you certainly didn't offend me and you're not violating anyone's privacy by bringing up this discussion. I just have a disagreement and maybe it's a misunderstanding as you say. But I figured that if this woman told Martin Celmins that she did not want to be identified in his book, then she wants to retain her privacy. It makes no difference to me whether I know her name or not, but I suppose others may feel differently.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dino (Post 1132371)
Same here.:nod:

subscribing to all that, too! :nod: the only thing i'm sorry about is that this led to any discussion AT ALL, as i absolutely didn't intend to bring up one. i only asked a question (we're all a bit curious here sometimes, aren't we?!) . . . but sorry - no, i'm not gonna start all over afresh. i can certainly live very well without knowing her name. i'll leave it at that and i won't be asking again - promised. :angel:

i just wanna have a good time here! till next time :wavey:
martin

slipkid 06-20-2014 12:16 AM

I haven't read MC's book in six years. Is this the American from LA who married PG, or the previous relationship? The American woman from LA has made sure Peter Green would never see his daughter as a minor.


I would hope now that the daughter is in her thirties, she would try to understand Peter Green's life. If that isn't a BBC documentary in waiting..... It's "Philomena", without the Irish Catholic church making up rules, and clouding the facts.

dino 06-20-2014 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slipkid (Post 1132609)
I haven't read MC's book in six years. Is this the American from LA who married PG, or the previous relationship? The American woman from LA has made sure Peter Green would never see his daughter as a minor.


I would hope now that the daughter is in her thirties, she would try to understand Peter Green's life. If that isn't a BBC documentary in waiting..... It's "Philomena", without the Irish Catholic church making up rules, and clouding the facts.

No, this is not Mrs Samuels, it's a woman Greeny had a relationship in the mid 70's.

Ms Moose 06-23-2014 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazy poker (Post 1132374)
subscribing to all that, too! :nod: the only thing i'm sorry about is that this led to any discussion AT ALL, as i absolutely didn't intend to bring up one. i only asked a question (we're all a bit curious here sometimes, aren't we?!) . . . but sorry - no, i'm not gonna start all over afresh. i can certainly live very well without knowing her name. i'll leave it at that and i won't be asking again - promised. :angel:

i just wanna have a good time here! till next time :wavey:
martin

I agree with you, lazy poker. We are all a bit curious here on The Ledge. If we weren't, there would be no Ledge at all. We are constantly asking questions about all kinds of issues relating to PG. I have been wanting to put this Lady question up now and then. When I read a biography I like to know who is talking through the pages.
You beat me to it and now you take all blame;).
But it is a storm in a tea-cup.We can be curious and accept that somebody wants to keep their privacy at the same time. Knowing The ledgies here, I don't think anyone is offended.
And Dino: Yes, it is very unusual these days that someone don't want to be famous and have their 15 minutes of stardom:laugh: Might there be a generational difference here? I don't know.

Ms Moose:angel:

lazy poker 06-23-2014 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms Moose (Post 1132922)
I agree with you, lazy poker. We are all a bit curious here on The Ledge. If we weren't, there would be no Ledge at all. We are constantly asking questions about all kinds of issues relating to PG. I have been wanting to put this Lady question up now and then. When I read a biography I like to know who is talking through the pages.
You beat me to it and now you take all blame;).
But it is a storm in a tea-cup.We can be curious and accept that somebody wants to keep their privacy at the same time. Knowing The ledgies here, I don't think anyone is offended.

thank you so much for coming to my rescue, ms moose! :xoxo:
well, disagreements cannot always be avoided, and quite naturally so. as long as nobody gets hurt there's nothing wrong with it. in the end we're all rockin' in the same old boat, aren't we?! but let me see - maybe i can come up with a little bit less controversial topic next time 'round . . . ;)
martin


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved