mezzoforte |
08-22-2011 11:54 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC
(Post 1009458)
...and it rains fast, and it rains hard... Sorry, couldn't resist.
Sounds like you have classic senioritis. I don't envy you one bit. School couldn't end soon enough for me. Book learning is way, way overrated IMHO.
|
Well played.;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumidesigns
(Post 1009456)
you can say that again!
so Dani.............we're getting tats right!? :blob1:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniellaaarisen
(Post 1009459)
If I'm magically not broker than broke by the time I see you, YES.
|
I'd be right there with you guys, but look into it first.
Highlights from the link:
"The FDA also does not require ingredient disclosure on the inks—they are considered proprietary (trade secrets)—and so tattoo inks may contain any chemical, including those known to be mutagenic (capable of causing mutations), teratogenic (capable of causing birth defects), and carcinogenic (capable of causing cancer), or involved in other biochemical reactions in the body that might take decades to appear."
"The carrier solution itself might contain harmful substances such as denatured alcohols, methanol, rubbing alcohol, antifreeze, detergents, or formaldehyde and other highly toxic aldehydes."
|