michelej1 |
09-30-2013 07:58 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by applebucked
(Post 1105690)
Buckingham Nicks, Schmuckingham Nicks. Christine and Lindsey's relationship is a more interesting soap opera. :laugh:
|
He hasn't been in a position to push Stevie around since Christine left.
If you mean the way Christine badmouthed Lindsey after he left in 1987, Stevie did that too. In fact, in the interview where she said that Lindsey made her get at the back of the bus even Christine said, "whoa!" like she thought Stevie was being extreme. Stevie has never been less outspoken against Lindsey than Christine. The only difference is people (John, Mick and Lindsey) respect Christine more than Stevie, so they tended to pay more attention to Christine and to ignore Stevie's complaints.
Aside from the drink in the face, I'm not sure what he ever did that Christine didn't put up with. He seemed to have his way on stage and in the studio when Chris was there and didn't have to compromise as much with Stevie back then either. To win an argument with Lindsey, Stevie would have had to have both Mick and Christine on her side back then. Nowadays, to win an argument with him all she has to do is threaten not to tour.
Aside from having 30% less room to do his own thing, I don't see how Christine's absence has helped him any or given him the chance to get away with anything. Take the stage for instance, if he'd wanted Come in the setlist, Christine might have played on it or she might have told him she refused to play on it (just as Stevie left the stage during Come herself), but I don't think Christine would have tried to keep it out of the setlist or off the album. He could have had 6 strange songs he wanted on SYW and wouldn't have had to include BTLH and SYHA again, because Christine would have provided the equivalents to make up for their absence.
Michele
|