PDA

View Full Version : Chaos Erupts in Iraq


dissention
04-09-2004, 10:42 PM
Chaos Erupts in Parts of Central Iraq

17 minutes ago

By LEE KEATH, Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A U.S. AC-130 gunship raked insurgents Friday night after hundreds of women and children fled the besieged city of Fallujah during a U.S.-declared pause in the Marine offensive. On the anniversary of the fall of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s regime, Baghdad and parts of central Iraq (news - web sites) were chaotic.

Gunmen running rampant on Baghdad's western edge attacked a fuel convoy, killing a U.S. soldier and an Iraqi driver and causing a fiery explosion. Two American soliders and an unknown number of civilians were missing after the attack, and 12 people were injured, Pentagon (news - web sites) officials said. A Baghdad correspondent for Al-Jazeera Arab television said at least nine people were killed.

Another U.S. soldier was killed in an attack on a base elsewhere in the capital, and large groups of insurgents battled U.S. troops in two cities to the north, Baqouba and Muqdadiyah.

One Marine was killed in Fallujah and another wounded in exchanges of fire after U.S. forces called a halt to offensive operations in the city, a spokesman said.

The death — along with those of three Marines a day earlier announced Friday — brought the toll of U.S. troops killed across Iraq this week to 46. The fighting has killed more than 460 Iraqis — including more than 280 in Fallujah, a hospital official said. At least 647 U.S. soldiers have died in Iraq since the war began in March 2003.

At a square in the capital where Saddam's statue was toppled a year ago, soldiers took down a disturbing new icon: pictures of the radical Shiite cleric whose followers have risen up against coalition forces in the south.

For the first time, U.S. troops moved in strength into the heartland of the rebellion by the militia of Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. More than 1,000 troops backed by tanks pushed into the southern city of Kut, retaking police stations and government buildings seized this week by Shiite gunmen.

Elsewhere, fighting with al-Sadr's al-Mahdi Army militia diminished. Coalition forces largely left gunmen in firm control in three cities of south central Iraq, and further south, coalition troops have largely succeeded in taming the uprising, though Italian troops still saw light fighting in the city of Nasiriyah.

In Fallujah, Marines halted their assault on Sunni insurgents to allow U.S.-picked Iraqi leaders — angry at the United States over the bloodshed from five days of heavy fighting — to hold talks with city leaders about how to reduce the violence.

Throughout the afternoon, fighting was reduced to sporadic gunfire. But when night fell, heavy explosions resumed as an AC-130 gunship strafed targets and soldiers and insurgents engaged in a mortar battle.

The AC-130 hit a cave near Fallujah where insurgents took refuge after attacking Marines. A 500-pound laser-guided bomb also struck the cave, said spokesman 1st Lt. Eric Knapp.

Iraq's top U.S. administrator, L. Paul Bremer, said the unilateral pause was also aimed at allowing humanitarian aid to enter the city and Fallujah residents to tend to their dead.

Many families, emerging from their homes for the first time in days, buried slain relatives in the city football stadium.

A stream of hundreds of cars carrying women, children and elderly headed out of the city after Marines announced they would be allowed to leave. Families pleaded to be allowed to take out men, and when Marines refused, some entire families turned back.

The heavy fighting in Fallujah — during which mosques have been damaged and buildings demolished — has made the city of 200,000 a symbol of resistance for some Iraqis and threatens to divide the Iraqi Governing Council and the U.S. administration that appointed it.

Military hesitation over the halt in fighting was clear. After initially being ordered to cease all offensive operations, Marines quickly demanded and received permission to launch assaults to prevent attacks if needed.

"We said to them (the commanders): 'We are going to lose people if we don't go back on offensive ops.' So we got the word," Marine Maj. Pete Farnun told The Associated Press.

Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt underlined that talks between two Governing Council members and sheiks and clerics representing Fallujah representatives were not negotiations, suggesting the military would not be making concessions. U.S. officials were not participating in the talks, which began Friday.

The Governing Council early Saturday issued a statement demanding an end to military action and "collective punishment" — a reference to the Fallujah siege.

Abdul-Karim Mahoud al-Mohammedawi, a Shiite on the Governing Council, announced he was suspending his council seat until "the bleeding stops in all Iraq." He also met Friday with al-Sadr, whom U.S. commanders have vowed to capture.

A Sunni council member, Ghazi al-Yawer, said he would quit if the Fallujah talks fell through.

One of the strongest pro-U.S. voices on the council, also a Sunni, Adnan Pachachi, denounced the U.S. siege. "It was not right to punish all the people of Fallujah, and we consider these operations by the Americans unacceptable and illegal," Pachachi told Al-Arabiya TV.

Meanwhile, in a signal of how U.S. forces face a new enemy in Iraq, two pictures of al-Sadr hung from a sculpture in Baghdad's central Firdos Square, where one year ago Marines toppled a statue of Saddam.

A U.S. soldier climbed a ladder to tear down the posters, and the military warned that al-Sadr's followers were planning bomb attacks in the area. Hours later, a mortar hit nearby, shaking two hotels where foreign journalists and contractors are staying.

U.S. troops drove into Kut before dawn Friday, pushing out members of al-Sadr's al-Mahdi Army militia that seized the southern textile and farming center this week after Ukrainian troops abandoned the city under heavy attack.

A U.S. helicopter struck al-Sadr's main office in Kut, killing two people, witnesses said. Americans were patrolling the streets during daylight.

Kimmitt said he expected the operation to retake Kut would be finished by Saturday morning. "We are fairly comfortable that the town of al-Kut is well on its way to coming back under coalition control," he said.

Still, he suggested a move against al-Sadr's militia controlling parts of Najaf and Karbala would have to wait, because hundreds of thousands of Shiite pilgrims are in the area this weekend for al-Arbaeen, which commemorates the end of the period of mourning for a 7th-century martyred saint.

"We expect that those special cities that are currently observing the Arbaeen will continue to have some al-Sadr presence," he told reporters.

Al-Sadr on Friday demanded U.S. forces leave Iraq, saying they now face "a civil revolt."

"I direct my speech to my enemy Bush and I tell him ... you are fighting the entire Iraqi people," al-Sadr said in a sermon, delivered by one of his deputies at the Imam Ali Shrine in Najaf, Shiite Islam's holiest site.

Al-Sadr, a young, firebrand anti-U.S. cleric, is thought to be holed up in his office in Najaf, protected by scores of gunmen. He has said he is willing to die resisting any American attempt to capture him.

Gunmen on the highway outside Baghdad were seen stopping a car carrying two Western civilians — apparently private security guards, because both had sidearms. The gunmen pulled the men from the car, firing at the ground to warn them to obey. Their fate was not known.

The heavy fighting for Fallujah was prompted by the March 31 slaying of four U.S. civilians there. Their burned bodies were mutilated and dragged through the streets by a mob that hung two of them from a bridge.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

strandinthewind
04-09-2004, 10:49 PM
I know i just saw that!!!!!!

YYYIIIPPPEESSSS!!!!!

dissention
04-09-2004, 10:51 PM
Originally posted by strandinthewind
I know i just saw that!!!!!!

YYYIIIPPPEESSSS!!!!!

I'm telling you, man, a civil war will break out within a week. This has been brewing for a year. :nod:

strandinthewind
04-10-2004, 12:35 AM
not according to Billy O.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102632,00.html

Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly. Thanks for watching tonight. A short "Talking Points" memo because we want to get right to the Condoleezza Rice (search) testimony. Once again, the elite media have misled you. On the front pages of The New York Times, The L.A. Times and The Washington Post, the words "uprising in Iraq" are featured.

One problem, it's not an uprising. The Berlin Wall deal was an uprising. The regular folks rebelling against an entrenched authority is an uprising. Militant attacks in Iraq are an insurgency, not an uprising. This kind of stuff makes me angry. The elite media often spins information to make editorial points. And that's really wrong. Let me read you an e-mail from a Marine in the middle of the Fallujah fighting to put things into perspective.

"We are kicking their butts out here. We took the initial punch and responded. The enemy is dying in great numbers. We Marines are attacking with a fury I myself had not imagined. While we did not anticipate this surge, we're comfortable we'll win the fight. Semper, fi, pk.."

Today in Iraq, there was less fighting and no uprising. "Talking Points" is confident the American military will crush the al-Sadr militia and subdue the town of Fallujah. Again, somebody alert the elite media. There is no uprising in Iraq.
_____________________________

than WTF are the marines fighting - a down rising? What an idiot

darklinensuit
04-10-2004, 12:35 AM
:(

- Jake

gldstwmn
04-10-2004, 12:45 AM
Originally posted by dissention
I'm telling you, man, a civil war will break out within a week. This has been brewing for a year. :nod:

We should have known better. It's like Joe Klein was saying tonight on Paula Zahn. "The people of Mesopotamia have a long history of fighting and winning against the infidels." Our next question to the War President should be how was this allowed to happen?
Also, is anyone else slightly freaked out that our domestic military force is a bit thin right now?

gldstwmn
04-10-2004, 12:47 AM
Originally posted by strandinthewind
not according to Billy O.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102632,00.html

Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly. Thanks for watching tonight. A short "Talking Points" memo because we want to get right to the Condoleezza Rice (search) testimony. Once again, the elite media have misled you. On the front pages of The New York Times, The L.A. Times and The Washington Post, the words "uprising in Iraq" are featured.

One problem, it's not an uprising. The Berlin Wall deal was an uprising. The regular folks rebelling against an entrenched authority is an uprising. Militant attacks in Iraq are an insurgency, not an uprising. This kind of stuff makes me angry. The elite media often spins information to make editorial points. And that's really wrong. Let me read you an e-mail from a Marine in the middle of the Fallujah fighting to put things into perspective.

"We are kicking their butts out here. We took the initial punch and responded. The enemy is dying in great numbers. We Marines are attacking with a fury I myself had not imagined. While we did not anticipate this surge, we're comfortable we'll win the fight. Semper, fi, pk.."

Today in Iraq, there was less fighting and no uprising. "Talking Points" is confident the American military will crush the al-Sadr militia and subdue the town of Fallujah. Again, somebody alert the elite media. There is no uprising in Iraq.
_____________________________

than WTF are the marines fighting - a down rising? What an idiot

Guess he hasn't seen the pictures.

darklinensuit
04-10-2004, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by gldstwmn
Also, is anyone else slightly freaked out that our domestic military force is a bit thin right now?

Yes.

- Jake

DeeGeMe
04-10-2004, 07:14 AM
From news accounts, it's not pretty apparent that the Sunni & Shi'ite Muslims, long-time enemies have now joined forces to fight the US troops. This is not good news no matter what you want to call it-rebellion, civil war, insurgency, or my personal favorite, quagmire.

dissention
04-10-2004, 09:46 AM
Originally posted by gldstwmn
Also, is anyone else slightly freaked out that our domestic military force is a bit thin right now?

Hell yes. And it's going to be MUCH thinner becasue they're sending much more over to Iraq. Rummy has been wanting it for ages and he's finally getting his wish.

dissention
04-10-2004, 09:47 AM
And the people in Iraq are absolutely furious that the US sent mercenaries into their country. I'd bet money that's what fueled the flames.

strandinthewind
04-10-2004, 09:48 AM
Originally posted by gldstwmn
We should have known better. It's like Joe Klein was saying tonight on Paula Zahn. "The people of Mesopotamia have a long history of fighting and winning against the infidels." Our next question to the War President should be how was this allowed to happen?
Also, is anyone else slightly freaked out that our domestic military force is a bit thin right now?

He had no stated or discernable plan to rebuild Iraq in this climate. He literally thought they would welcome us with open arms. While the Iraqi's did welcome the ouster of SH and were not in general so vehemently opposed to the US in the VERY beginning of this, we have from the outside apprearance drug our ass for a year and apparently they are pissed off to the point of putting aside religious differences to fight us.

Also, I do not get "Also, is anyone else slightly freaked out that our domestic military force is a bit thin right now? " - Explain (please)

strandinthewind
04-10-2004, 09:50 AM
Originally posted by dissention
Hell yes. And it's going to be MUCH thinner becasue they're sending much more over to Iraq. Rummy has been wanting it for ages and he's finally getting his wish.

I for one think, like Powell and several other prominent and experienced in warGenerals, they have always needed more troops in Iraq. But Rummy half assed it there as well and now the piper wants to be paid.

dissention
04-10-2004, 09:51 AM
Originally posted by strandinthewind
I for one think, like Powell and several other prominent and experienced in warGenerals, they have always needed more troops in Iraq. But Rummy half assed it there as well and now the piper wants to be paid.

Yeah, they did want it all along, but they wouldn't say so because the public would say hell no. It's all politics.

strandinthewind
04-10-2004, 09:58 AM
Originally posted by dissention
Yeah, they did want it all along, but they wouldn't say so because the public would say hell no. It's all politics.

the second "they" is Rummy and W, not including Powell, right?

dissention
04-10-2004, 10:13 AM
Originally posted by strandinthewind
the second "they" is Rummy and W, not including Powell, right?

It includes Puppet, er, Powell. He's every bit the politician as Shrub.

strandinthewind
04-10-2004, 10:22 AM
Factually, it is incorrect. I believe he strongly advised W to put more troops in Iraq in the beginning.

dissention
04-10-2004, 11:04 AM
Originally posted by strandinthewind
Factually, it is incorrect. I believe he strongly advised W to put more troops in Iraq in the beginning.

But he didn't come out and say publicly that he wanted more troops because they were needed. I don't give a **** what his weasel ass said to Shrub privately; they are not Shrub's troops. When more human lives are going to be sent to death, let the American people know that you want them to be sent. Don't hide behind bureaucracy and express your thoughts privately. This is par tof the reason I'm so pissed off: the secrecy of this administration. And I've heard Powell say numerous times int he media that he thins there are enough troops, so he's telling us what we want to hear when he deems fit.

gldstwmn
04-10-2004, 12:07 PM
Originally posted by strandinthewind

Also, I do not get "Also, is anyone else slightly freaked out that our domestic military force is a bit thin right now? " - Explain (please)

Why is a large percentage of the National Guard in Iraq? Who's watching out for us here?

strandinthewind
04-10-2004, 12:09 PM
Originally posted by gldstwmn
Why is a large percentage of the National Guard in Iraq? Who's watching out for us here?

Ah - just curious - i did not get it at first!!!!

:cool:

gldstwmn
04-11-2004, 12:29 AM
I am reading reports that in Fallujah yesterday the US forces were letting women, children and elderly leave the city but making the men stay behind as we prepared to attack.

dissention
04-14-2004, 09:54 AM
I am reading reports that in Fallujah yesterday the US forces were letting women, children and elderly leave the city but making the men stay behind as we prepared to attack.

Yeah, but many of the women, children, and elderly didn't get out and were killed along with the men. :shocked: